On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 02:54:25 emenifee [via jogamp] wrote:
>
> I noticed the website is jogamp.org however the code uses com.jogamp as the
> base package
>
> Should the code be refactored to properly match the organization as
> org.jogamp?
>
> Should jogamp.com be registred and redirected/pooled with the jogamp.org
>
> Should we just ignore the standard package naming convention?
>
The 'naming convention' of Java packages
does not 'require' to have an internet domain bound .. even though it's kind of close,
ie hinting to do/have so :)
If we start a new package 'moving day' .. then not necessarily for this one,
but for the javax name space - which is [still] being used because of
historical reasons :)
(my opinions)
~Sven
Locked
