Reply – Re: Migrating Java 3D to Maven, and publishing Maven artifacts
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: Migrating Java 3D to Maven, and publishing Maven artifacts
— by Sven Gothel Sven Gothel
On 11/18/2015 04:52 PM, ctrueden [via jogamp] wrote:
> I really like this idea! However, given the rate things are going with Java 3D
> these days,

I agree here .. and if Harvey also agrees,
maybe somebody else can take the lead role for our Java3D?
This is not a demotion, just a practical approach of the current situation,
as all our 'roles' are just a condensation of reality :)

Sure .. we would need somebody taking that role.
Volunteers are welcome!

> I cannot afford to hold my breath for Java 3D 1.7—nor even to
> invest the energy required to push for it over the next months.
Sure.

>
> I receive multiple bug reports each month relating to Java 3D + Java 8
> incompatibility; users need it fixed ASAP. So for the time being, I will keep
> maintaining the org.scijava fork, with updated package prefixes:
> org.scijava.java3d and org.scijava.vecmath.

if it works for you ..

>
> In the meantime, if there anything I can do to help move Java 3D forward on
> the Maven front etc., the JogAmp team is welcome to contact me via email.

I myself don't want to take the above role,
but as I mentioned .. you yourself could also take that role,
which you rejected last time we had a chat :)

So .. volunteers may step forward for Java 3D!
  - merge things
  - communicate
  - push deployments

Cheers, Sven



signature.asc (828 bytes) Download Attachment