> I really like this idea! However, given the rate things are going with Java 3D
> these days,
I agree here .. and if Harvey also agrees,
maybe somebody else can take the lead role for our Java3D?
This is not a demotion, just a practical approach of the current situation,
as all our 'roles' are just a condensation of reality :)
Sure .. we would need somebody taking that role.
Volunteers are welcome!
> I cannot afford to hold my breath for Java 3D 1.7—nor even to
> invest the energy required to push for it over the next months.
> I receive multiple bug reports each month relating to Java 3D + Java 8
> incompatibility; users need it fixed ASAP. So for the time being, I will keep
> maintaining the org.scijava fork, with updated package prefixes:
> org.scijava.java3d and org.scijava.vecmath.
if it works for you ..
> In the meantime, if there anything I can do to help move Java 3D forward on
> the Maven front etc., the JogAmp team is welcome to contact me via email.
I myself don't want to take the above role,
but as I mentioned .. you yourself could also take that role,
which you rejected last time we had a chat :)
So .. volunteers may step forward for Java 3D!
- merge things
- push deployments