Atomic deployment of Candidate version

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Atomic deployment of Candidate version

luren0
Hi,

I would like to try the last Candidate version with a manual atomic deployment.
It seems that this version is not complete: http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-next.
I cannot find archives for atomic deployment as well as for "nativewindow".

Can somebody tell me where I could find a complete Candidate version?

Thanks,
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Atomic deployment of Candidate version

Sven Gothel
Administrator
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 06:47:25 PM luren0 [via jogamp] wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to try the last Candidate version with a manual atomic
> deployment.
> It seems that this version is not complete:
> http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-next
> http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-next .
> I cannot find archives for atomic deployment as well as for "nativewindow".
>
> Can somebody tell me where I could find a complete Candidate version?
>

Oops, somebody like the atomic variant ?

Sorry, I have removed them from deployment.
But sure .. if there is an interest in them, I can resurrect them.
Will do .. I currently edit the deployment scripts anyways
for the new filesystem structure.

Cheers, Sven

> Thanks,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://forum.jogamp.org/Atomic-deployment-of-Candidate-version-tp3333175p3333175.html
> To start a new topic under jogl, email [hidden email]
> To unsubscribe from jogl, visit
health & wealth
mailto:
[hidden email] ; http://jausoft.com
land : +49 (471) 4707742 ; cell: +49 (151) 28145941
Timezone CET: PST+9, EST+6, UTC+1
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Atomic deployment of Candidate version

luren0
Yes,

I like it to be as light as possible.
Will this also be available in the rc3?
Thank you by advance.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Atomic deployment of Candidate version

Sven Gothel
Administrator
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 08:43:59 PM luren0 [via jogamp] wrote:
>
> Yes,
>
> I like it to be as light as possible.
> Will this also be available in the rc3?

sure ..

see new post on new FHS ..

However .. one reason for using the 'all' jar files
is the higher performance of using less jar files,
even if the memory footprint is a bit bigger.

But you are right, should keep that alive.

~Sven

> Thank you by advance.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Atomic deployment of Candidate version

luren0
Thank you for bringing back the atomic version!
I just can't seem to find the "nativewindow" JARs. Do we still have to use it?

I've also noticed a difference since rc2:
The files "jogl_es1.dll" and "jogl_es2.dll" have disappeared from "jogl-natives-windows-i586.jar". Is "jogl_desktop.dll" the only DLL now required for Windows platform?

Thanks.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Atomic deployment of Candidate version

Sven Gothel
Administrator
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 02:44:39 PM luren0 [via jogamp] wrote:
>
> Thank you for bringing back the atomic version!
> I just can't seem to find the "nativewindow" JARs. Do we still have to use
> it?
>
> I've also noticed a difference since rc2:
> The files "jogl_es1.dll" and "jogl_es2.dll" have disappeared from
> "jogl-natives-windows-i586.jar".

Just read .so == .dll :)

Yup, they are merged to libjogl_mobile.so,
which is the mobile equivalent (ES1/ES2) to libjogl_desktop.so (GL2-GL4).

Remaining native libs
  libnativewindow_awt.so  [libnativewindow_x11.so]  libnewt.so

> Is "jogl_desktop.dll" the only DLL now
> required for Windows platform?

well, gluegen's and nativewindow one (see above) is somehow required too.
If in doubt, look at the contents of
  gluegen-rt-natives-windows-amd64.jar, jogl-all-natives-windows-amd64.jar

Sure, you can also walk through the jnlp dependency of the atomic ones,
I hope I haven't missed anything there (didn't test it yet).

~Sven

>
> Thanks.
>