JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102

Sven Gothel
Administrator
JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102

https://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/gluegen_928-joal_650-jogl_1489-jocl_1135/

Previous aggregation issues resolved:
- javadoc available (and updated matching java11 style)
- 'java -jar jogamp-fat.jar' uses GLWindow like etc/test.sh
- Also one important MacOS issue resolved

The builds ..
- https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/gluegen/928/
- https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/joal/650/
- https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jogl/1489/
- https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jocl/1135/

~Sven
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102

Sven Gothel
Administrator
almost forgot, the aggregated build now also includes
- android-x86
- ios-aarch64 (ex jocl)
- ios-amd64   (ex jocl)

Current platform matrix:
- linux-amd64
- linux-armv6hf
- linux-aarch64
- macosx-amd64
- windows-amd64
- android-armv6
- android-aarch64
- android-x86
- ios-amd64
- ios-arm64

~Sven

On 1/2/20 7:46 PM, Sven Gothel [via jogamp] wrote:

> JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102
>
> https://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/gluegen_928-joal_650-jogl_1489-jocl_1135/
>
> Previous aggregation issues resolved:
> - javadoc available (and updated matching java11 style)
> - 'java -jar jogamp-fat.jar' uses GLWindow like etc/test.sh
> - Also one important MacOS issue resolved
>
> The builds ..
> - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/gluegen/928/
> - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/joal/650/
> - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jogl/1489/
> - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jocl/1135/
>
> ~Sven
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102

Sailsman63
For clarity, does this mean that x86 support for linux/win/osx is being dropped, or is the matrix a bit limited for the rc builds?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102

Sven Gothel
Administrator
On 1/2/20 8:15 PM, Sailsman63 [via jogamp] wrote:
> For clarity, does this mean that x86 support for linux/win/osx is being
> dropped, or is the matrix a bit limited for the rc builds?

A while ago I dropped inter 32bit support (x86, i686, ..)
b/c for some platforms (macos at least) no JVM/JRE is any more available.
Further .. well, nobody complained about this on the desktop.

HOWEVER, if there is a good reason to keep a i686 for a certain OS alive,
I like to hear it and may re-enable it.

Yes, the status quo is for RC and release, as we use a rolling release model.

~Sven
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102

Sven Gothel
Administrator
See
http://forum.jogamp.org/Poll-Intel-32bit-i686-builds-linux-and-or-windows-tp4040230.html

On 1/2/20 8:50 PM, Sven Gothel [via jogamp] wrote:

> On 1/2/20 8:15 PM, Sailsman63 [via jogamp] wrote:
>> For clarity, does this mean that x86 support for linux/win/osx is being
>> dropped, or is the matrix a bit limited for the rc builds?
>
> A while ago I dropped inter 32bit support (x86, i686, ..)
> b/c for some platforms (macos at least) no JVM/JRE is any more available.
> Further .. well, nobody complained about this on the desktop.
>
> HOWEVER, if there is a good reason to keep a i686 for a certain OS alive,
> I like to hear it and may re-enable it.
>
> Yes, the status quo is for RC and release, as we use a rolling release model.
>
> ~Sven
>