Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102
https://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/gluegen_928-joal_650-jogl_1489-jocl_1135/ Previous aggregation issues resolved: - javadoc available (and updated matching java11 style) - 'java -jar jogamp-fat.jar' uses GLWindow like etc/test.sh - Also one important MacOS issue resolved The builds .. - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/gluegen/928/ - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/joal/650/ - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jogl/1489/ - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jocl/1135/ ~Sven |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
almost forgot, the aggregated build now also includes
- android-x86 - ios-aarch64 (ex jocl) - ios-amd64 (ex jocl) Current platform matrix: - linux-amd64 - linux-armv6hf - linux-aarch64 - macosx-amd64 - windows-amd64 - android-armv6 - android-aarch64 - android-x86 - ios-amd64 - ios-arm64 ~Sven On 1/2/20 7:46 PM, Sven Gothel [via jogamp] wrote: > JogAmp RC Build 2.4.0-rc-20200102 > > https://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/gluegen_928-joal_650-jogl_1489-jocl_1135/ > > Previous aggregation issues resolved: > - javadoc available (and updated matching java11 style) > - 'java -jar jogamp-fat.jar' uses GLWindow like etc/test.sh > - Also one important MacOS issue resolved > > The builds .. > - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/gluegen/928/ > - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/joal/650/ > - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jogl/1489/ > - https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jocl/1135/ > > ~Sven ... [show rest of quote]
|
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For clarity, does this mean that x86 support for linux/win/osx is being dropped, or is the matrix a bit limited for the rc builds?
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
On 1/2/20 8:15 PM, Sailsman63 [via jogamp] wrote:
> For clarity, does this mean that x86 support for linux/win/osx is being > dropped, or is the matrix a bit limited for the rc builds? A while ago I dropped inter 32bit support (x86, i686, ..) b/c for some platforms (macos at least) no JVM/JRE is any more available. Further .. well, nobody complained about this on the desktop. HOWEVER, if there is a good reason to keep a i686 for a certain OS alive, I like to hear it and may re-enable it. Yes, the status quo is for RC and release, as we use a rolling release model. ~Sven |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
See
http://forum.jogamp.org/Poll-Intel-32bit-i686-builds-linux-and-or-windows-tp4040230.html On 1/2/20 8:50 PM, Sven Gothel [via jogamp] wrote: > On 1/2/20 8:15 PM, Sailsman63 [via jogamp] wrote: >> For clarity, does this mean that x86 support for linux/win/osx is being >> dropped, or is the matrix a bit limited for the rc builds? > > A while ago I dropped inter 32bit support (x86, i686, ..) > b/c for some platforms (macos at least) no JVM/JRE is any more available. > Further .. well, nobody complained about this on the desktop. > > HOWEVER, if there is a good reason to keep a i686 for a certain OS alive, > I like to hear it and may re-enable it. > > Yes, the status quo is for RC and release, as we use a rolling release model. > > ~Sven > ... [show rest of quote]
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |