Administrator
|
JogAmp Update
================ First of all, I have picked up my JogAmp work momentum. "Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man.", J. Robert Oppenheimer or maybe better "Everyone has a plan until they get hit", Mike Tyson Let's leave it at that.. +++ The JogAmp server were updated thrice over the last months. Finally the toolchain (bugzilla, Wiki, Wiki-Bugzilla) works again. - Using Debian 9, OpenJDK-8 - Updated Jenkins, Bugzilla, Mediawiki - Now using https://wiki.mozilla.org/Help:Bugzilla_Extension Last package update & reboot has just been completed. +++ Further - Most pull requests via github has been merged - Most late changes reflected next version 2.4.0 <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.4.0> - Gitlab has been added as 3rd fallback https://gitlab.com/jogamp +++ Further our Jenkins build target platforms has been reduced. Now we have: - android-aarch64 - android-armv7-img - linux-armv7hf-img - linux-x86_64-amd - macosx-10_6-x86_64-nvidia - win7-x86_64-nvida Dropped were: - linux-x86_32 - win7-x86_32 - solaris-x86_32 - solaris-x86_64 Probably new target will be: - linux-aarch64 JogAmp [Roadmap] Update ========================= - New bugs will be set on version 'to be determined (tbd)' <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_undetermined_release> - Next Version 2.4.0 <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.4.0> - Version 2.5.0 <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.5.0> IF we make a hard cut regarding Java-11 support, it will move to Version 3.0.0. However, I don't like these 'hard cuts', which would render Java-8 platforms obsolete. See Bug 1363 <https://jogamp.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=1363> Cheers, Sven |
Administrator
|
Over the course of last days,
I walked the bugzilla list and assigned the versions. Next Version 2.4.0's definition should be in good shape. <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.4.0> If you really need a bug to be added to 2.4.0, please let me know via this forum/email thread. +++ As a special, I started implementing Source Certification Contract (SCC) https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SCC_Overview Group https://jogamp.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=1368 Basic SHA256 in GlueGen Done https://jogamp.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=1369 +++ After release 2.4.0 we may head to tackle - iOS support - Java-11 and last but not least Vulkan later on. +++ Every commercial entity is more than welcome to fund our work monetarily, besides the normal course of work contributions. http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/Maintainer_and_Contacts#Contact_Maintainer +++ On 3/29/19 4:36 PM, Sven Gothel [via jogamp] wrote: > JogAmp Update > ================ > > First of all, I have picked up my JogAmp work momentum. > > "Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man.", > J. Robert Oppenheimer > > or maybe better > > "Everyone has a plan until they get hit", Mike Tyson > > Let's leave it at that.. > > +++ > > The JogAmp server were updated thrice over the last months. > Finally the toolchain (bugzilla, Wiki, Wiki-Bugzilla) works again. > > - Using Debian 9, OpenJDK-8 > - Updated Jenkins, Bugzilla, Mediawiki > - Now using https://wiki.mozilla.org/Help:Bugzilla_Extension > > Last package update & reboot has just been completed. > > +++ > > Further > > - Most pull requests via github has been merged > > - Most late changes reflected next version 2.4.0 > > <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.4.0> > > > - Gitlab has been added as 3rd fallback https://gitlab.com/jogamp > > +++ > > Further our Jenkins build target platforms has been reduced. > > Now we have: > - android-aarch64 > - android-armv7-img > - linux-armv7hf-img > - linux-x86_64-amd > - macosx-10_6-x86_64-nvidia > - win7-x86_64-nvida > > Dropped were: > - linux-x86_32 > - win7-x86_32 > - solaris-x86_32 > - solaris-x86_64 > > Probably new target will be: > - linux-aarch64 > > > JogAmp [Roadmap] Update > ========================= > > - New bugs will be set on version 'to be determined (tbd)' > <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_undetermined_release> > > > - Next Version 2.4.0 > <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.4.0> > > > - Version 2.5.0 > <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.5.0> > > > IF we make a hard cut regarding Java-11 support, > it will move to Version 3.0.0. > However, I don't like these 'hard cuts', > which would render Java-8 platforms obsolete. > > See Bug 1363 <https://jogamp.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=1363> > > Cheers, Sven |
Administrator
|
Hello
Do you plan to include the one-liner change fixing this warning? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55668631/can-the-following-warning-cause-any-problem-in-the-future-in-my-jogl-jogamp-ap
Julien Gouesse | Personal blog | Website
|
Administrator
|
Java 11+ Support is not being planned for 2.4.0.
Naturally it will get resolved within our process though. You know the details: http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php?title=SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.4.0 http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php?title=SW_Tracking_Report_Feature_Objectives_Overview My rational is to have 2.4.0 with most pressing bugs resolved within a very short timeframe - as you can see with my high activity in this regard (finally). Java 11 needs a little bit more time & love to have a compatible version for Java [6..8] and Java >= 11. Cheers, Sven On 4/14/19 11:09 AM, gouessej [via jogamp] wrote: > Hello > > Do you plan to include the one-liner change fixing this warning? > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55668631/can-the-following-warning-cause-any-problem-in-the-future-in-my-jogl-jogamp-ap > > Julien Gouesse | Personal blog <http://gouessej.wordpress.com> | Website > <http://tuer.sourceforge.net> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: > http://forum.jogamp.org/JogAmp-Roadmap-Update-tp4039653p4039703.html > To start a new topic under general, email [hidden email] > To unsubscribe from general, click here > < > NAML > <http://forum.jogamp.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > |
Administrator
|
Ok, it makes sense. Please take care of yourself.
Julien Gouesse | Personal blog | Website
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |