Jogl and JavaFX

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
26 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Jogl and JavaFX

gouessej
Administrator
Qu0ll wrote
Well, OpenGL 1 support or not, I certainly think the community should be investing effort in getting JavaFX and JOGL to work together.  
If Direct3D can't be disabled in JavaFX by using a public and reliable mean, it won't work at all.

Qu0ll wrote
I am sure that the JOGL community could have a workable solution up and running *years* before anything Oracle releases.  And, it would be vastly superior anyway...
Some minimal changes in JavaFX are required to make it work, including the one I mentioned above. It doesn't mean that we need to wait for Oracle for everything but some mechanisms in Quantum, Glass and Prism are not publicly exposed. We can only make a suboptimal (very slow) solution based on FBOs currently.

Qu0ll wrote
Any takers?
I will be able to work on JavaFX only when it is fully integrated in OpenJDK and when I have enough time. The first step will consist in implementing the very slow solution in order to have something to show and to use in the meantime, until the community will obtain the programmatic mean of implementing a better solution based on an equivalent of JAWT but for JavaFX. As more and more developers are going to use JavaFX, we need some sort of interoperability.
Julien Gouesse | Personal blog | Website
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Jogl and JavaFX

elect
How is the current situation of jogl and javafx?

Using jogl inside javafx will involve an overhead?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Jogl and JavaFX

Xerxes Rånby
The current situation of jogl and javafx
and strategies to reduce overhead
is summarized and described in detail here:
https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=607#c20

2016-05-03 13:16 GMT+02:00 elect [via jogamp] <[hidden email]>:
How is the current situation of jogl and javafx?

Using jogl inside javafx will involve an overhead?


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.jogamp.org/Jogl-and-JavaFX-tp4030720p4036672.html
To start a new topic under jogl, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from jogamp, click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Jogl and JavaFX

elect
Hi Xerxes :)

What's GraphUI? Where can I read more about it?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Jogl and JavaFX

Xerxes Rånby
GraphUI is part of JogAmp
See page 52 and forward from the JogAmp Siggraph 2014 presentation:
http://jogamp.org/doc/siggraph2014/bof/jogamp-siggraph2014-bof.pdf
video: https://youtu.be/BbbiUyeE0VU?t=41m39s

GraphUI implements Resolution independent NURBS curves rendering using programmable graphics pipeline.
slides: http://jogamp.org/doc/gpunurbs2011/graphicon2011-slides.pdf
paper: http://jogamp.org/doc/gpunurbs2011/p70-santina.pdf

GraphUI API is work in progress. Blueprints of what we would like to archive for the next major jogamp release is found on the JogAmp bugzilla:
https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=803



2016-05-03 13:45 GMT+02:00 elect [via jogamp] <[hidden email]>:
Hi Xerxes :)

What's GraphUI? Where can I read more about it?


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.jogamp.org/Jogl-and-JavaFX-tp4030720p4036675.html
To start a new topic under jogl, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from jogamp, click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Jogl and JavaFX

elect
Thanks for the links
12