> you would have to start somewhere. Having a temporary mix of ant + maven
> is completely fine. As long nobody starts at the root of the tree.
> JOAL/JOCL are leaves.
so that this will not become some unmaintained patch for one of our modules.
> -michael
>
>
> On 08/25/2010 07:41 PM, Sven Gothel [via jogamp] wrote:
> > On Monday, August 23, 2010 14:09:54 Michael Bien [via jogamp] wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > this is not a fun task to spend your freetime on :). Using maven for
> > > our build wouldn't have many benefits, we would only loose some
> > > flexibility. The jogl build does not contain much what could be
> > > simplified via the convention over configuration paradigm. In fact the
> > > scripts are highly custom. Its more than just compiling stuff.
> > >
> > > If you would like to still experiment with it i recommend to start with
> > > JOCL. JOCL is a leaf of the dependency tree (depends on gluegen-rt and
> > > jogl) and has only a tiny build script (~330 lines). To keep things
> > > simple you could just like Kraft did import jogl and gluegen-rt in your
> > > local repository and add it as dependencies. But even the JOCL build
> > > will not work without a way of being able to script parts of it...
> > >
> > > jocl has a build-time dependency to gluegen and a compiletime
> > dependency
> > > to jogl and gluegen-rt.
> >
> > However .. whatever somebody will do with a Maven support of JogAmp
> > modules,
> > please consider the following - without them it would make no sense at
> > all:
> >
> > 1 - for all JogAmp modules
> > 2 - being merged 'back' into the JogAmp master
> > 3 - being build on JogAmp and distributed
> > 4 - being maintained
> >
> > so .. we won't do 1 and 4,
> > and you also have to help us with 2 and 3 - of course.
> >
> > But if it's beneficial to your work, just do so,
> > then we can collaborate on 2 and 3, but please be there for point 4 :)
> >
> > If this will be only an initial effort from your side
> > then we can forget about all of this, since then it's just dead stuff.
> >
> > ~Sven
> >
> > >
> > > best regards,
> > > michael
> > >
> > > On 08/23/2010 06:08 AM, emenifee [via jogamp] wrote:
> > > > I agree Time is a tight resource....
> > > >
> > > > I was looking at accelerated graphics frameworks for a Java based
> > game
> > > > I was planning on creating, and decided to learn maven for my
> > managing
> > > > my project. I was disappointed to find that the current versions of
> > > > jogl and/or java3d were not in maven, only old versions...
> > > >
> > > > So now I have decided that my spare time could best be spent
> > > > converting jogl to build under maven, so that eventually it can be
> > > > maintained / built / referenced by other maven projects. Since at
> > the
> > > > lowest level everything seems to depend on gluegen I have forked that
> > > > project, with the intent of branching to creating a pom file, and
> > > > rearranging the source and dependencies to match a standard maven
> > > > project.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully I can make this work...and hopefully I can then follow
> > up by
> > > > making jogl into a maven project that depends on the gluegen maven
> > > > repository. At this point i am hip deep in learning maven and git
> > > > along with how everything in gluegen builds and fits together.
> > > >
> > > > As far as plans for the branch I understand that git properly handles
> > > > symlinks (on systems that support them) so I was going to build a new
> > > > directory structure that symlinked back to the normal repository
> > build
> > > > / layout files so that upstream changes would easily merge, and
> > once I
> > > > got it working with symlinks and accepted, hope to re-factor the
> > > > structure up a level to make it the default build routine by actually
> > > > replacing symlinks with original files at new locations...( that step
> > > > might be a pain for other developers...not sure how git handles
> > > > refactoring / code location changes during a merge )
> > > >
> > > > In addition to the article about unpacking and moving libs around at
> > > >
http://buildanddeploy.com/node/14, I came across another article
> > about
> > > > a maven plugin for JNI stuff that puts the lib files under the jar's
> > > > META-INF directory with a special library loader class that would
> > pull
> > > > the lib as a resouce file, save to a temporary location, then use
> > > > System.load("path"). I think this is similar to what JavaWS does
> > with
> > > > JNLP's that reference custom JNI code...
> > > >
> > > > So assuming I have not bitten off more than I can chew, and you are
> > > > patient enough Kraft, you may eventually get an up-to date maven
> > build
> > > > for jogl...
> > > >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > View message @
> > > >
> >
http://jogamp.762907.n3.nabble.com/What-about-Maven-tp844816p1284007.html
> > <
http://jogamp.762907.n3.nabble.com/What-about-Maven-tp844816p1284007.html?by-user=t>
> > > > To start a new topic under jogamp, email
> > > > [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=1336595&i=0>
> > > > To unsubscribe from jogamp, click here
> > > > <<Link Removed>>.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > View message @
> >
http://jogamp.762907.n3.nabble.com/What-about-Maven-tp844816p1336595.html> > To start a new topic under jogamp, email
> >
[hidden email]
> > To unsubscribe from jogamp, click here
> > <
http://jogamp.762907.n3.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=762907&code=YmllbmF0b3JAYXJjb3IuZGV8NzYyOTA3fDQxNTEwMDY0OA==>.
> >
> >
>
>