Posted by
Sven Gothel on
Dec 22, 2011; 4:27am
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/Strange-problem-on-new-laptop-tp3601952p3605835.html
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 04:50:47 PM Wade Walker [via jogamp] wrote:
>
> I've updated the wiki page at
>
http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/Downloading_and_installing_JOGL to be more
> explicit about exactly which files need to be downloaded, and from where
> I've also fixed it to reflect the latest changes in the distribution (the
> change from .zip to .7z and the removal of the newt and nativewindow JARs).
> Let me know if there's anything unclear there.
http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/Downloading_and_installing_JOGL:> Now you may copy the required JARs out of each jar folder and the native libraries out of each lib folder. For a full desktop installation, here are the files you need:
Can you remove the DLL and lib part, but focus on the native JAR files ?
The DLLs and lib folder should not be required anymore
and using the native JAR files is much easier.
Using the native JARs also aliases away the different set of platform DLLs
like: nativewindow_win32.dll libnativewindow_x11.so ...
(Your table has an error there as well, ie win32 for all)
They also may be gone w/ the all-platforms 7z file, or will be relocated
in their respective platform subfolder to resolve naming conflicts, lib/<os.and.arch>/ :
lib/linux-i586/
lib/linux-amd64/
...
My opinion: Remove the notion of the lib folder and focus on native JAR files.
Maybe put the native lib folder in a bottom section like 'more details' .. or so.
>
> Note that right now it only tells how to set up for building a JOGL app in
> an IDE or on the command line (as described at
>
http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/Setting_up_a_JogAmp_project_in_your_favorite_IDE).
> It doesn't yet say how to set up an applet or a Web Start app.
>
Here again we may need to describe the different deployment forms
as demonstrated on our test-applet-page (Dual, LApplet, JApplet, NApplet, ..).
I actually prefere NApplet right now, since it doesn't require JNLP and is just
less work to do.
Plus we may need to update the Object/Embed stuff, since simple Applet tags won't
do it anymore (-> Safari for example).
What do you think ?
~Sven