Posted by bkuker on Apr 05, 2012; 11:41am
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/Loading-libraries-from-an-executable-JAR-is-seriously-hard-tp3885657p3886952.html

Thank you, I must have misunderstood:

> I guess it's time to remove the per platform archive files
> in favor of the all-platform one.

> Will keep the native libraries in there,
> however we may remove it's reference from the wiki (howto, guides, etc)
> or at least mark them as *alternative*. They cost lots of confusions.

From another thread.

I'll keep trying to find a way forward with the fat jar, before trying to convince the upstream project to switch to jar-in-jar, but the takeaway for now is that JOGL prefers a jar-in-jar as the solution for a single file executable jar.

> However, the fat JAR can be achieved with the current API model, yes.

Do you mean this with or without changes to the JogAmp libraries themselves?