Posted by gouessej on Nov 26, 2012; 4:25pm
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/appbundler-jogl-jnilib-dylib-one-jar-confusion-tp4027169p4027224.html

nyholku wrote

On 26.11.2012 17.39, "gouessej [via jogamp]"
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
>    The fat jar approach is a really bad idea under Windows and GNU Linux
>because the archiver can open it instead of Java, lots of people use
>WinRAR under Windows and on other Linux distros some people use Ark.

Ack that, but I've turned the fat jar to .exe with launch4j and it works
nicely
and then we should not have this problem you mention.

Yes you should not have the problem I mentioned but if something goes wrong with launch4j, we won't be able to help you, especially if you use a non standard embedded JVM. It would be less risky to use Java Web Start.

nyholku wrote

>
>
>I think that you have the same problem under Ubuntu and Mac OS X. Maybe
>we can fix this bug but I still don't recommend this way of deploying
>applications based on JOGL 2.0.


Do you meant that I need to unpack the .so files?

I tried that and it did not make a difference?

Still wondering about badly formatted URL ... looks like if
the URL had a correct format this might have actually worked?!

Thanks for responding.

br Kusti

It's worse than I thought. I thought unpacking the .so files would work.