Sven Gothel wrote

On 02/11/2013 01:45 PM, gouessej [via jogamp] wrote:
> It's ok for me if and only if you put this change into a separate RC and if
> you push it to Maven in order to avoid some troubles in engines as it modifies
> the public API.

'seperate' ?

http://translate.google.fr/#fr/en/s%C3%A9par%C3%A9 'separate'

Sven Gothel wrote

You mean: publish ASAP as RC and maven when published in source ?

Currently going through all bugs etc, a next RC (release 2.0.2)
will happen after all major bugs are squashed.

A pre-bundle (the usual aggregated build) and a maven can be produced ASAP
after commit - of course, so downstream (Ardor, JME3, ..) can use them
and are in sync w/ public API.

Later changes to GL ES3/4.3 will require the same.
However .. at that time we will be close to 2.0.2

Is that OK?

~Sven




signature.asc (911 bytes) <http://forum.jogamp.org/attachment/4028197/0/signature.asc>