>     neothemachine wrote
>     gouessej [via jogamp] wrote:
>     > Maik, would it be enough for you? System.getProperty() returns a system
>     > property, not the value of an environment variable unlike
>     > System.getenv().get().
>
>     That's the point :)
>
>     Jogl already uses the environment variable (a bit hidden through the
>     'null' value of X11Lib.XOpenDisplay(null). What I want is to force Jogl
>     to use a different (custom) value instead. And the key is that it's not
>     possible to change environment variables, but it is possible to change
>     system properties.
>
> Ok but then, should we name it "DISPLAY"? Shouldn't we pick a more specific
> name? x11.newt.display? whatever?