Re: MulJogamp Timings
Posted by
gouessej on
Oct 31, 2013; 10:27pm
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/MulJogamp-Timings-tp4030420p4030452.html
gmseed wrote
OK. It's just that the jogamp-jocl tutorial page is citing a paper comparing itself against jocl and javacl, in which the basis and results of the test are questionable.
JNA-based bindings are intrinsically slower than JNI-based bindings and personally, I'm not sure that the previous maintainer is wrong. Feel free to show us why his results are questionable.