Posted by Wade Walker on Nov 01, 2013; 7:25pm
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/MulJogamp-Timings-tp4030420p4030458.html

gmseed wrote

OK. It's just that the jogamp-jocl tutorial page is citing a paper comparing itself against jocl and javacl, in which the basis and results of the test are questionable.

I think the point of that paper was to compare the overheads of the three Java OpenCL bindings, not to compare OpenCL with the CPU. In that case we're not interested in how long the kernel itself takes, only how long it takes to start the kernel and how long it takes to be notified when it's done (since that's where any extra overhead is).