Posted by
Sven Gothel on
Oct 28, 2015; 6:58pm
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/Issues-with-JOGL-under-OS-X-tp4035608p4035648.html
On 10/27/2015 10:49 AM, agggile [via jogamp] wrote:
> Hey. Thought I'd post this here because I can't put my mind around this issue.
> So, I'm in the midst of reconstructing some extremely old code, and I decided
> to update JOGL. I'm not even sure what sort of JOGL build the old code was
> using. Anyway, I successfully updated the libs to a more recent build. The
> code works with every Windows build I've come across, but for some reason it
> won't function under OS X. Here's a log with debug-all:
>
>
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=jsa3cAtGThank you for the log file, I have to analyze it in detail and compare it,
see below.
However, it seems that general initialization has passed and was successful.
+++
It would be great if you could:
- use the latest Oracle JRE for OSX
- try one of our applets on you machine
and produce the log file.
<
http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-current/jogl-test-applets.html>
Also state whether the applets work in general on your machine.
Best is you can test multiple applets, i.e.
- one simple one, i.e. Gears
<
http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-current/jogl-applet-runner-newt-gears-normal-napplet.html>
- one which uses AWT as your applet does,
look on the bottom of the applet test page
which include GLCanvas and GLJPanel tests.
E.g.: <
http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-current/jogl-applet-gl2_gljpanel02.html>
- produce the log file w/ the Oracle JRE and your application
- tar+gz/zip the log files and publish them for us.
>
> After that, it's just "NSOpenGLLayer.Attach: Re-Queue, drawableHandle
> 0x7f7fbb02f9a0 - AWT-AppKit" for an additional 3 billion lines, after which I
> dispose of everything and return to the original screen. I'm extremely new to
> OpenGL and JOGL, but I assume there's some sort of information hidden in that
> log. I will provide code from the project when necessary.
It is possible that this issue is somewhat inherent to your application.
Hence we do need all infos as stated above.
~Sven