Posted by runiter on
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/Java3D-1-6-0-Released-tp4037525p4037947.html

My script is basically feeding jarjar with the following rules.txt:

rule org.jogamp.java3d.utils.** com.sun.j3d.utils.@1
rule org.jogamp.java3d.** javax.media.j3d.@1
rule org.jogamp.vecmath.** javax.vecmath.@1

But from what your explains there seem to be several hardcodes references to packages.

I agree that the new package naming is much nicer but I wonder if this is worth it the trouble.
After all, most people who use Java3D use it to be backward compatible with their older projects.
I don't think many new developers will chose Java3D when there are other options such as Ardor3D and JavaFX available. Am I wrong?