Posted by gouessej on
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/Java3D-1-6-0-Released-tp4037525p4037949.html

Yes it's worth the trouble. Now there is no risk of collision with the old Java3D 1.3 versions still installed under OS X. Anyway, we aren't allowed to use "javax" in our package name. We should have moved to a new package naming earlier.

I'm against investigating tons of time in keeping backward compatibility. Maybe we can find a solution for your specific problem. Using binary serialization was a bad idea. If you used an XML encoder, it would be more flexible.