> I know that there is a problem with Java 1.9 under OS X, I don't deny it
> and the modified version *of Java3D* works around a bug in JOGL caused
> by changes in Java itself, it doesn't fix the real bug. However, you can
> still make a pull request against Phil's repository as I'd like to know
> his opinion. Predrag Bokšić's changes affect Java3D as far as I know,
> not JOGL. Some questionable workarounds are better than no solution at
> all but we need a pull request, we need to see exactly why it works even
> though it doesn't release the context properly and by the way, I still
> don't understand exactly why you needed to add a DLL for AWT somewhere
> under Windows to make it work. I cannot go any further and help you both
> if you don't share your findings in the most suitable way, not by
> sending a compressed archive without indicating clearly what changes in
> the source code have been done. If making a pull request is too
> complicated for you, please post at least a diff file. Ignoring the
> exceptions isn't a satisfying solution. JOGL and Java3D are under open
> source licences, we don't hide any part of the source code, either you
> work in an open and transparent manner like us, or you solve your
> problems without the help of the JogAmp community, the choice is yours.
> I'm sorry, maybe I'm a bit touchy but when I read "our new version of
> jogl" and when I still get no clear explanation of what changes fixed
> your problems, I'm really upset. I'm a volunteer, I have used JOGL since
> 2006, I answered your questions even during my holidays. Making a new
> version of JOGL ready for a release requires a lot more work than just
> fixing a few things privately. Modifying the source code just to catch
> some exceptions that shouldn't even be thrown isn't a fix even though it
> allows you not to use my clean workaround already working without Java
> Webstart. Of course, I would prefer a solution that works with and
> without Java Webstart but a dirty solution not fixing the real bugs
> isn't acceptable on the long term, there is a huge difference between
> tinkering some code and providing testable strong fixes.
> Julien Gouesse | Personal blog <http://gouessej.wordpress.com> | Website
> <http://tuer.sourceforge.net>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://forum.jogamp.org/Jogl-Jogamp-on-Java-9-tp4038012p4038493.html
> To unsubscribe from Jogl/Jogamp on Java 9, click here
> <
> NAML
> <http://forum.jogamp.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>