Posted by Sven Gothel on Jun 01, 2010; 7:23pm
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/JavaFX-1-3-tp862258p862613.html

On Tuesday, June 01, 2010 21:02:52 Michael Bien [via jogamp] wrote:
>
> Sven Gothel wrote:
> >
> > Let's just assume we name our version 3.0 for now.
> >
> since there is no public JavaFX-JOGL (which JavaFX might use or not) i would
</snip>

Let me emphasize the 'for now' ending of my sentence.
Yes, sounds ambiguous .. so let me rephrase it 'for here only' :)

Didn't want to kick off another 'name the thing' discussion :)