Posted by Michael Bien on Jul 21, 2010; 5:13am
URL: https://forum.jogamp.org/Revisiting-the-Manilla-Benchmark-using-Bridj-tp983376.html

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Revisiting the "Manilla Benchmark" using Bridj
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:45:57 -0400
From:	Jeff Palmer [hidden email]
To:	Michael Bien [hidden email], Olivier Chafik [hidden email]

Michael & Olivier,
The JavaCL-Bridj preview is out.  Having already written a benchmark with
timings preserved on a webpage, it was logical to revisit this.

There is no-longer a low level bindings, so I changed it to JavaCL proper.
If I compare the old OpenCL4Java code with the new Bridj version I get a
66.5% reduction.  My problem is when I compare the absolute timings to those
on the web page, the base line is now 3x larger, so the reduction just puts
JavaCL back where is was.

I am finding this a little hard to understand.  I could almost put it down
to I am now running 257.21, but back in early March 196.xxx.  The ICD could
also be different.

If I look closely at my first post however, I say my avg. MS per loop is
from my Mac, but in the rules I give nVidia version #'s.  I re-ran the
original code on OSX with beta4 OpenCL4Java, and I get a 2.5x increase. Even
here the date on the OpenCL "DLL" is now 06/10/10.  I do not know how I got
a file that new.

Trying to keep my sanity, I thought I would just run the JOCL side.  If it
also was much higher, then just ignore the old data.  Problem is I cannot
get it to run.  The source is missing an import, no biggie, but I built a NB
library wt 
- jocl.jar
- jocl-natives-windows-amd64.jar
- jocl-natives-windows-i586.jar
- gluegen-rt.jar

I am getting an unSatisfiedLinkError: no jocl in java.library.path .  What
am I missing?

Thanks,

Jeff