Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
Release 2.3.2 <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/Release_2.3.2>
Tracking report <http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.3.2> Maven packages are deployed on jogamp for 2.3.2, Mark will update them on official maven repo soon. Yes .. we were a bit late, but we had a few nasty bugs to squish first. Thx to Xerxes and others who found quite a few issues and who were 'holding my hand' and validated! Thank you! Have fun .. and lets see how we can 'break the game' for 2.4.0 <http://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.4.0> which shall be a 'new feature' release focusing on Graph UI and more .. Cheers, Sven |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
Further more, I want to thank CCT International a lot
for financial and technological support of Göthel Software e.K., supporting JogAmp! Without CCT's unconditional and no questions asked support since May 2010, this project would not be possible at all! Thank you CCT! |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
I thank Sven and all contributors for their pugnacity. I thank CCT International too for its financial support.
Julien Gouesse | Personal blog | Website
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for this release and their contributors.
![]() I used the build 1462 for Sweet Home 3D 5.1 at the beginning of the week, but will upgrade to this more official release for next version.
Emmanuel Puybaret
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Sven Gothel
Hi Sven,
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 21:23 -0700, Sven Gothel [via jogamp] wrote: > Release 2.3.2 <https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/Release_2.3.2> > Thanks for the new release. However, there seems to be a problem building v2.3.2 on openSUSE that I did not see with v2.3.1, viz., when linking using ld, I get the error: ld unrecognized -a option `tic-libstdc++' This happens probably due to the new linker-argument added to the make file 'make/gluegen-cpptasks-base.xml': <linkerarg value="-static-libstdc++" if="isGCC"/> Compiling v2.3.2 after removing every occurrence of this line from the 'make/gluegen-cpptasks-base.xml' file leads to a successful build again. Please let me know if this is because I am doing something wrong, or if indeed patching out this line is the way to go. Thanks. -- Atri Bhattacharya Sun 11 Oct 12:25:36 MST 2015 Sent from openSUSE 13.2 on my laptop. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
There is something wrong on your side as the expected error message should be "ld unrecognized option `-static-libstdc++' ", it behaves like the linker argument had been broken into parts or misread on your machine :s
Julien Gouesse | Personal blog | Website
|
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On my system, ld has the short-form options -s, -t and -a. The '-a' option takes a keyword immediately following it. From the man entry:
"-a KEYWORD Shared library control for HP/UX compatibility" As a result, ld -static-libstdc++ is read as being equivalent to: ld -s -t -a tic-libstdc++ so that "tic-libstdc++" is interpreted as the keyword, which is obviously undefined. I think this is a very generic behaviour for ld, and not something particular to my system. Fwiw, I tested on a couple of other Linux systems too with similar results [same version of ld used: GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE 13.2) 2.24.0.20140403-6.1]. Anyway, my point is that ld does not have a -static-libstdc++ option in the first place, so this should be probably removed either way. Thanks. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |